Introducing the 2024–2025 Breakdown/(Re)generation Grantees
 

This summer, Incite Institute set out to award $300,000 in new grants through our Breakdown/(Re)generation Project, which supports Columbia University Arts and Sciences initiatives related to breakdowns in the social and natural worlds.

At present, seemingly stable systems are undergoing profound transformations: climate change disrupts longstanding ecological balances, political shifts challenge post-World War II norms, evolving perceptions of gender reshape identity formation, and epistemic shifts redefine how we learn and create knowledge. These disruptions allow us to reimagine and reconstruct systems, institutions, and norms to promote justice and equity in society. Our interest lies not only in understanding these breakdowns but also in exploring the possibilities of (re)generation that they bring about.

After an extensive search, we’re excited to introduce you to the 2024 Breakdown/(Re)generation grant recipients. Coming from disciplines including anthropology, earth science, and gender studies—and spanning from the Arctic Circle to Mexico—these projects and their leaders demonstrate remarkable potential to address and respond to breakdowns in innovative ways.


Art in the midst of cultural and ecological crisis

The project team working with sound artist Alexander Rishaug in Sørfinnset skole as part of developing a SørfinnsetTV episode, supported in part by Incite. Photo by Caitlin Franzmann.

With support from Incite, Denise Milstein (Sociology) is examining the work of artists responding to instances of ecological crisis and cultural erasure through care, research, experimentation, and the promotion of sustainable, diverse, and multi-species communities.

Two art projects, Ensayos and Sørfinnset skole/the nordland, model ways of building and working in community, producing and sharing knowledge, and mobilizing to address environmental challenges. At the center of this comparison is an examination of how relational art connects local and Indigenous communities with scientists, activists, and policymakers responding to the challenges of climate change.


Breakdown and (re)generation of racial justice movements

 
 

Colin Leach (Psychology and Africana Studies, Barnard College; Psychology and IRAAS, GSAS; Data Science Institute) is leading a multi-disciplinary team that works in a trans-disciplinary way to better understand how Black Lives Matter—the meme and the movement—moves people for, against, and away from racial justice in the U.S. and U.K.

The team, including Shaunette T. Ferguson (Psychology and Africana Studies, Barnard College; Data Science Institute) and Nikhi Anand (Psychology) is examining the unprecedented use of Black Lives Matter (labels and content) for online discussion of racial justice in the summer of 2020 (after the murder of George Floyd) in comparison to previous time periods.

A deeper understanding of the system dynamics of racial justice discussion in light of racialized killing, protest, and police and authority responses should begin to offer suggestions of how to intervene in the system to produce productive breakdowns and the (re)generation of genuine and shared concern and commitment to a common justice.


Breakdown and (re)generation of Arctic carbon

The Arctic is changing quickly, warming nearly 4x faster than at the equator, and these changes have significant implications not only for Arctic peoples and landscapes, but for all of humanity as we share a common atmosphere.

With support from Incite, Kevin Griffin and Ed Barry (Earth and Environmental Sciences; Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology) aim to create new knowledge and provide critical insights into the ecology of the Arctic and the massive amount of carbon stored there.


Peer exit and the breakdown/(re)generation of adolescent relations

With support from Incite, James Chu (Sociology) will investigate how the structure of adolescent friendship and homework-helping relationships changes in response to the departure of their peers, how these effects vary based on the circumstances of exit (e.g. the centrality of the departing member’s network position), and corresponding consequences of peer exit for the academic achievement and mental health of those who remain.

Chu’s goal is to elucidate how various kinds of peer exit break down adolescent friendship and academic support networks, the circumstances where peer exit enables regeneration of these networks, and how these patterns of exit-induced breakdown and regeneration in peer group structure affect adolescent welfare.


Making the X multiple: “Y the X?”

As a novel gender marker, the X represents a reaction to shifting norms surrounding what was previously a formal gender binary; through flattening a broad spectrum of genderqueer experiences into one isolated category, it reconstitutes the validity of the gender marker system and M/F as the standard.

Through a website that serves as part oral history and part art installation, Madisson Whitman (Center for Science and Society) and team (Eden Martin, Sociology; Kris Koh, Columbia College; Lloy Hack, History) intend to present the people behind the X in all their complexity, re/generating a spectrum of (gender)queer meanings while challenging gender markers’ essentialist meaning. As an analog means of dissemination that is conscious of the richness of queer tradition, the team will also publish a zine compilation of their interviews and art.


The promise and paradox of climate change litigation

 
 

In the context of the global climate change crisis and the growing recognition of the need to identify and pursue alternative, more sustainable, socio-economic activities and ways of being, this project will examine ambitious litigation pursued by South African Indigenous groups to oppose mining and protect their way of life.

Supported by Incite, Jackie Dugard (Institute for Study of Human Rights) will explore the motivations for, and modes including litigation of, resistance against destructive economic activity; and the contours and ramifications of the assertion of any alternative socio-economic paradigms, particularly those (such as decolonial eco-feminism) with the potential to counteract climate change through their (re)generative, sustainable character. In addition, struck by the injustice that communities that benefited the least from the dominant economic development model (and are most vulnerable to climactic fluctuations) are now on the frontline of climate transition efforts, the project aims to explore the socio-legal implications of this paradox.

To carry out this work, Dugard will collaborate with Wilmien Wicomb (attorney, Legal Resources Centre, South Africa) and the community in Baleni Village and Steenberg’s Cove in South Africa.


Rethinking recovery

The Rethinking Recovery Working Group conducts critical exploration of how the notion of “recovery” is deployed across domains of biomedicine, pandemic politics, climate change, economics, and other fields of governance. Employing the dual lenses of transformative justice and feminist/intersectional science and technology studies, the group pays close attention to the reciprocal relations between techno-scientific practices and knowledges, on the one hand, and multiple intersecting axes of power on the other.

The Group’s principal investigator is Samuel R. Roberts (History and Sociomedical Sciences) and is co-directed by Rebecca Jordan-Young and Elizabeth Bernstein (Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies at Barnard).


Led by Claudio Lomnitz (Anthropology, Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race), the Social Study of Disappearance Lab is dedicated to the social study of forced disappearance in comparative perspective, with a special focus on the case of Mexico, a country where disappearance continues to be a daily occurrence, and forced disappearance represents a sustained, perilous form of breakdown, both at the level of state and society.

The Lab is supported by Emily Hoffman (Anthropology) and María Sabater at Columbia, as well as a board of prominent Mexican academics, advocates, and legal professionals.

 
Michael Falco
New panel series explores the 2024 election—and what's at stake.
 

What’s at stake in the 2024 Presidential Election, both at home and abroad?

This October, we’re bringing together leading political experts and scholars for a three-part panel series exploring key topics shaping this pivotal election, including voting behavior, domestic policy, and the global implications of U.S. foreign policy.

This program is the result of a partnership with The Academy of Political Science, and is is also supported by the Urban and Social Policy Program and Institute of Global Politics at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.

Attendance is free and open to the public, but registration is limited.


Voting in the 2024 Presidential Election

10/02, 2:00–3:30 PM ET

  • Robert S. Erikson is Professor of Political Science at Columbia University, specializing in American political behavior, elections, quantitative methodology, and statistics.

  • Donald P. Green is the Burgess Professor of Political Science at Columbia University. His research interests span a wide array of topics: voting behavior, partisanship, media effects, campaign finance, hate crime, and research methods.

  • Christina M. Greer is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Fordham University (Lincoln Center campus). Her research and teaching focus on American politics, black ethnic politics, urban politics, campaigns and elections, and public opinion.


The 2024 Presidential Election and Domestic Policy: What’s at Stake?

10/09, 2:00–3:30 PM ET

  • Ester R. Fuchs is Professor of International and Public Affairs and Political Science and the Director of the Urban and Social Policy Program at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs. She serves as Director of WhosOnTheBallot.org, an online voter engagement initiative for New York City. She served as Special Advisor to the Mayor for Governance and Strategic Planning under New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg from 2001 to 2005.

  • Alexis Grenell is the co-founder of Pythia, where she leads innovative issue campaigns for workers rights’, gender equality, climate policy, and small “d” democracy. Alexis is also a columnist for The Nation where she frequently writes about gender, politics and power among other issues. Her work has also appeared in the New York Daily News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Daily Beast, Newsday, the New York Post, El Diario, and City & State. In 2015, she earned her Masters in Public Administration from Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA).

  • Basil Smikle Jr. is a Professor of Practice and Director of the M.S. program in nonprofit management in the School of Professional Studies at Columbia University. As an MSNBC Political Analyst, he regularly shares his insights on national media outlets. With 20 years in higher education and 30 years devoted to public service, his insights span a broad spectrum of contemporary issues including, civic engagement, nonprofit advocacy and communications, electoral politics and education policy.  He lectures at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs and Teachers College at Columbia University. 

  • Moderated by Robert Y. Shapiro, who is Wallace S. Sayre Professor of Government in the Department of Political Science and Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. He is the President of The Academy of Political Science and Editor of its journal, Political Science Quarterly.  He specializes in American politics with research and teaching interests in public opinion, policymaking, political leadership, the mass media, and applications of statistical methods.


The World at Large: Foreign Policy in the 2024 Election
10/16, 2:00–3:30 PM ET

  • Amy L. Freedman is department chair and professor of political science at Pace University and adjunct associate research scholar at Weatherhead East Asian Institute at Columbia University. Previously, she was professor of political science and international affairs at LIU Post.

  • Evan D. McCormick is Director of Research at Incite Institute at Columbia University. McCormick was an Associate Research Scholar on the Obama Presidency Oral History, for which he focused on the Obama administration’s foreign policies and the Obama presidency in a global context.

  • Francesco Ronchi is an Adjunct Professor in International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. He also serves as a European Union official, overseeing democracy support activities for the European Parliament. He is the former Deputy of the Cabinet of the President of the Socialists and Democrats Group. He has served the United Nations as a Member of the Cabinet of the UN Special Representative for Ivory Coast.

  • Gideon Rose is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Political Science at Columbia University, and an affiliate of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies. He is the Mary and David Boies distinguished fellow in U.S. foreign policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and the former editor of Foreign Affairs.


Incite Institute is an interdisciplinary research institute at Columbia University. We produce knowledge for public action. We do so by joining with people and organizations within and outside the university to rethink our understanding of what knowledge is, how it’s created, and how it can be used.

The Academy of Political Science, founded in 1880, promotes nonpartisan, scholarly analysis of political, social, and economic issues by sponsoring conferences and producing publications. Published continually since 1886, the Academy’s journal, Political Science Quarterly, is edited for both specialists and informed readers with a keen interest in government, politics, and international affairs

The Institute of Global Politics convenes leading scholars and practitioners to foster civil discourse and create evidence-based policy strategies for real-world impact. We are also committed to training the next generation of leaders, providing opportunities for Columbia students to build the skills needed to address complex policy challenges. Our work focuses on five key areas of impact: geopolitical stability, democratic resilience, climate and sustainable development, inclusive prosperity and macroeconomic performance, and technology and innovation

The Urban and Social Policy Program at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs provides students with the content knowledge, critical thinking and analytic skills needed for a successful career in urban and/or social policy, while offering students the flexibility to specialize in policy focus areas that fit their own unique academic and professional interests.

 
Michael Falco
Fund your dream project with Incite Institute
 

Have an idea for an initiative that brings people together to generate insight and incite change?

This summer, Incite Institute is making over $200,000 in grants available through three programs. Whether you’re an artist, activist, journalist, organizer, scholar, or community leader—and no matter where you are in the world—we may have a grant that’s right for you.


Assembling Voices

$25K for innovative public initiatives across America

New Yorkers from all five boroughs convene at Hey Neighbor NYC—an art project created by Assembling Voices Fellows Kisha Bari and Jasmin Chang that invited organizers from distinct communities to interact across cultural, geographic, and interest-based silos. Photo by Emily Schiffer.

Seeking its fourth cohort this year, Assembling Voices is a fellowship for artists, writers, scholars, journalists, performers, activists, workers, and others in the United States with compelling ideas for public initiatives that bring people together around issues of democracy, equity, and trust.

In addition to $25,000 in financial support, fellows will receive administrative and intellectual support, including tailored workshops held in New York City. Successful proposals are innovative in their design and presentation, reach diverse audiences, and address community-identified and community-specific needs.

Past Fellows have built programming with a variety of innovative forms, including a home movie archive, a fashion show, a community photography event, and a theatrical installation centering the experiences of unhoused people.

Some of the initiatives we support are brand new; others seek to achieve greater scale and depth with our support. We’re open to all ideas, and this year we’re especially interested in projects related to environmental justice, disability justice, performing arts, and/or technology.

📅 Key dates


Global Change Program

Up to $25K for change-makers around the world

Participants at a Global Change Program-sponsored Re-imagenemos event in 2023.

Through the Global Change Program (GCP), Incite provides grants to leaders of initiatives across the globe that offer innovative, community-centered approaches to some of the world’s most pressing challenges, including climate breakdown, access to education, interstate conflict, and public health crises, among others.

This year, after a successful pilot with Colombian community think tank Re-imaginemos, GCP will award several grants ranging from $10,000 to $25,000 to change-makers around the world.

GCP is open to change-makers of all kinds, including activists, organizers, community leaders, scholars, and artists. In many cases, initiatives we support will be brand new; others may be existing but seek to move in new directions, experiment with new methods, or achieve greater scale and depth.

Awardees will remain in the field during the award year while receiving intellectual support from Incite, including facilitated collaboration with a center or institute of their preference at Columbia University.

📅 Key dates


+ Left Field Fund ⚾

Up to $5,000 for projects that advance our mission

Have an idea for a project that doesn’t fit our existing funding programs, but meets our mission? New this year, the Left Field Fund may be able to grant your project up to $5,000.

The Left Field Fund Committee meets every two months to review 250-word proposals.

Pitch us on our website.


About Incite Institute

Incite is an interdisciplinary institute at Columbia University. We join with people and organizations within and outside the university to rethink our understanding of what knowledge is, how it’s created, and how it can be used.

Find out more >

 
Michael Falco
Making sense of America's book ban boom
 

A new study in PNAS Nexus takes an empirical look at the U.S. book ban landscape.

Book bans in public schools are increasingly common in the United States, with the 2021–2022 school year seeing a higher number of bans than any previous year. The contexts in which these bans take place are fragmented and complex, often driven by collaborations between local parent organizations and national political organizations. 

A new study in PNAS Nexus, co-authored by Incite's Jack LaViolette, makes empirical sense of this rise, examining the genres of books being banned (as well as their authors), the socio-political contexts in which bans occur, as well as the impact of bans on the popularity of banned titles.

Among other findings, the authors found that banned books are disproportionately written by people of color and feature characters of color, both fictional and historical, and that bans are more likely to occur in right-leaning counties that have become less conservative over time. Moreover, many banned titles have "low interest" prior to bans and are not subject to meaningful changes in interest after a ban has been put in place.

The authors suggest that these findings indicate that book bans function more as symbolic political actions intended to galvanize shrinking voting blocs than as effective censorship efforts.

Read more in PNAS Nexus.

 
Michael Falco
Pedagogy of Listening Lab expands programming with two grants 🥇 🥇
 

In December 2023 we announced the Pedagogy of Listening Lab, which set out to bring together faculty, researchers, and students from different disciplines at Columbia University to advance understandings of pedagogies of listening. Since December, the team has hosted monthly meetings between faculty, fostered oral history exchanges with alumni, observed classes, engaged in interdisciplinary discussions, and begun work on a pedagogical toolkit.

Over the last months, we've been pleased to support some of this work at Incite. This week, we're proud to announce that the Listening Lab was awarded two grants from Columbia's Office of the Provost that will enable the Lab to expand its work.


[1] Dialogue Across Difference Seed Grant

Awarded to Ovita F. Williams, Lecturer in Discipline, School of Social Work; Amy A. Starecheski, Senior Lecturer, Oral History Masters Program; Sayantani DasGupta, Senior Lecturer, Master’s Program in Narrative Medicine; and Liza Zapol, Lecturer, Oral History Masters Program


This grant—which aims to strengthen skills necessary to confront challenging viewpoints and hold difficult conversations with mutual respect—will go toward the Pedagogy of Listening Symposium, which will be held in the Fall of 2024. It will be a full day symposium, open to educators and students, for the Lab to present on and workshop the Pedagogy of Listening Toolkit: a ten-module guide for teaching and strengthening listening skills. Filled with exercises, resource materials, general knowledge and practical skills, the toolkit enhances our ability to engage in conversations across differences, supports educators in building connection through listening, and centers our lived experiences. Focusing on listening for and across power (where tellers and listeners come from different levels of relative social power), it can be utilized in anti-racist, anti-oppressive educational practices and in research settings.


[2] Cross-Disciplinary Frontiers Courses at Columbia

Awarded to Amy Starecheski, Senior Lecturer, Oral History Masters Program; and Sayantani DasGupta, Senior Lecturer, Master’s Program in Narrative Medicine

This grant, which encourages cross-pollination at the Columbia campus, will go toward a new course, Power, Justice, Praxis: Listening Across Difference, which will introduce students to theoretically grounded listening practices incorporating attention to power, privilege, political difference, and personal identity, and give them opportunities to engage in practical listening labs. This course will examine interrelated questions informing listening and dialogue across difference such as:

  1. How do we make the internal experience of listening visible and legible to others?

  2. How do we know we have been listened to? What does the speaker ask of the listener? What are the relationships between witnessing, testimony, and listening?

  3. How do we make sense of listening as an embodied experience?

  4. What ways of communicating “count” as worthy of being listened to? How can we challenge and expand these boundaries?

  5. How does intersubjective listening transform participants? 

This 3-credit course will be open to undergraduate and graduate students at Columbia University, and will launch in Spring 2025.


Congratulations again to the Pedagogy of Listening Lab! We'll keep you posted on related news through our mailing list.

 
Michael Falco
🏆 Announcing the inaugural Incite Institute Doctoral Dissertation Grant recipients
 

In keeping with our intellectual and educational interest in engaging disciplines across the university, Incite funds ten $5,000 dissertation research grants for Columbia Graduate School of Arts & Sciences PhD students who have recently completed their prospectus.

In May 2024, we selected our inaugural cohort of grantees from across the university. From working with clinicians, patients, and investors to understand the financialization of fertility, to investigating alternative medical practices with residents of a former steel town, to building a sonic profile of the Western construct of Africa, the 2024 cohort’s projects cross academic boundaries and engage with the world outside the university.

We are gratified by the interest in this initiative from across the Arts & Sciences. The intellectual ability of all applicants and the quality of their projects were extremely strong. We congratulate our grantees and wish all applicants the very best in their work.

Meet the grantees >

 
With ten writers, in ten regions, America's elders make history
 
 

Today, the Baldwin-Emerson Elders Project becomes available to the public for the first time.

 

The stories of Black, Latine, Asian, Indigenous, and queer elders in America have been inadequately preserved by institutional archives, and award-winning writer Jacqueline Woodson has taken it upon herself to address the gaps in our collective memory.

In a moving letter written about her mother, who lived through the Great Migration, Woodson writes: “Her past was a silent, painful memory that she rarely shared. Like so many coming of age during Jim Crow, the horrors of the south were filled with stories that were ‘left’ in the south.” In the letter, Woodson describes returning to her mother’s home in Greenville after her death and finding extraordinary stories of survival and greatness in otherwise ordinary people, like her mother.

Launched in 2020 by Woodson’s nonprofit, Baldwin For The Arts, in partnership with Incite, I See My Light Shining: The Baldwin-Emerson Elders Project set out to capture and honor stories like those of Woodson’s mother. Inspired by the Federal Writers’ Project, the Elders Project sent ten prolific writers (named Baldwin-Emerson Fellows) across America to capture oral testimonies, photographs, and letters collected from over 200 elders.

Focusing on ten regions, the Elders Project examines topics including the emergence of social justice movements, gender and diversity politics, housing inequality and displacement, and stories of protest, rebuilding, love, and liberation. In their interviews, narrators chart the trajectories of their own lives against the changing social, economic, and cultural landscapes of the last century.

Author Eve L. Ewing’s collection—narrated through interviews with 20 elders—explores Black migration to and within Chicago, from the Great Migration to the legacies of displacement within the city. Writer Jenna “J” Wortham’s collection explores first-person accounts of queer pleasure on East Coast waterfronts, as well as the ways that these locations have become a site for queer exploration, expression, resistance, and ultimately, survival. The project’s ten collections have different geographic foci, but share a common interest in migratory trajectories and identity formation.

At Incite and the Oral History Archives at Columbia, Mary Marshall Clark and Kimberly Springer co-directed the project. Madeline Alexander project managed, navigating the complexity of ten simultaneous oral history projects in ten different regions. Alexander worked with Chris Pandza to develop an accessible, navigable, and vibrant digital archive. Today, this archive became available for the first time on a dedicated project website.

Louisiana-born Pasadena resident and healthcare worker Natalie Owens, second from left, with neighborhood friends. In her interview with Robin Coste Lewis, Owens charts her own life experiences against the changing social and cultural fabric of America, describing her marriages, family dynamics, education, while offering an important glimpse at 20th-century Black life in Los Angeles.

To celebrate this achievement, the Elders Project is hosting a panel, art show, and celebration at the Center for Brooklyn History on May 19th at 5PM ET. The event is free and open to the public.

In the coming months, the Elders Project will also host regional events corresponding with the collections’ geographic foci. To stay current with the Elders Project and other Incite news, subscribe to our mailing list.

 
Mellon Foundation Grants $1.7 million to support the Movements Against Mass Incarceration Lab at Incite at Columbia University
 

Building the United States' first archive to center the political ideas and movement-building of incarcerated individuals.

Angela Davis at her first news conference after being released on bail in February 1972. Photo by Bettmann via Getty Images.

Due to the persistent, systemic criminalization of Black, Latinx, Indigenous, Queer, and low-income communities, the United States currently holds the highest total number of incarcerated people anywhere in the world. But where there is oppression, there is also resistance — diverse organizers, activists, artists, and other cultural workers have worked tirelessly to elucidate the origins and consequences of the injustices of mass incarceration. Their movements have permanently shifted public discourse around mass incarceration and provide a vision for possible futures beyond the status-quo fixtures of prisons and policing. Now, it is time to center those with the embodied experiences of these struggles.

That is why Incite is proud to announce that the Mellon Foundation has awarded a $1.7 million grant through its Imagining Freedom Initiative to support the Movements Against Mass Incarceration Lab, a new project devoted to documenting and elevating the lived experiences, political movements, and freedom dreams of incarcerated people, their families, and allies. This three-year grant will enable a first-of-its-kind archive of 200 oral history interviews with incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people and their allies, each highlighting the political ideas, art, and movement building of incarcerated people. For our participants, we will then support and invest in their storytelling practices—whether audio production, visual media or film, writing, music, and beyond—so that they tell their stories on their terms.

“What incarcerated organizers and cultural workers share is a mutual set of practices that refuse the logics of prison and that transform the time and labor that prison attempts to extract into something else,” said David J. Knight, PhD, principal investigator and founding director of the project. “The Movements Against Mass Incarceration Lab aims to document this powerful alchemy so that the public better understands the political work and transformative contributions of incarcerated organizers, activists, and artists — what they struggled for, the networks they built, as well as the political art and movements they birthed.”

Incarcerated men at Attica Prison Raising Fists in Unison During Rebellion. Photo by Bettmann via Getty Images.

The archive centers the political visions and freedom organizing of incarcerated people by working with five grassroots organizations across the country—in Chicago, across Alabama, New York City, Oakland/San Francisco, and Atlanta. Partner organizations will each offer leadership and guidance on the content, facilitation, and distribution of the oral histories in their specific locales.

While the Movements Lab will be situated at Incite at Columbia University, the archive itself will be accessible for the public through partnerships with archives in these five communities, thereby democratizing the production of and accessibility to knowledge. This hyper local approach will center those with the lived experiences of this work, leaning on their expertise.

“We are honored and grateful for the opportunity to partner and to set this project ablaze with the work and perspectives of Abolitionist movements like ours. We as justice impacted people have been invisibilized. Our work, our stories, our creativity, our rights, our opportunities and much more. This project will serve as a rite of passage for us to the world. It is The Blackprint to Liberation. We must always preserve the journey of liberation, especially of justice-impacted visionaries. No one is free until we all are free!” said Denise Ruben, Co-founder and Deputy Director of Atlanta-based Barred Business, a partner organization of the Movements Lab.

Other social-change partners share the same sentiment. The Movements Lab oral history project is important “if we do not tell our own stories they face the danger of being written out of the historical narrative. We are the ones who are best able to tell our stories,”said Aislinn Pulley, director of the Chicago Torture Justice Center. “Documenting the experiences of survivors provides a deeper insight into how state violence against Black and brown people is waged during the time in which we live which is era of mass incarceration. This documenting pulls back the propaganda of the "war on drugs and hard on crime" mantras and instead reveals the traumatic violence inflicted upon our people."

“By archiving these stories, the Movements Against Mass Incarceration Oral History Project ensures that future generations can learn from the struggles to end mass incarceration, understand the challenges overcome, and continue the fight for justice and equality,” said Romarilyn Ralston, a long-time organizer with the California Coalition for Women Prisoners.

Aiyuba Thomas—whose work stands at the intersection of community building and education in marginalized and disenfranchised communities, most recently working as a researcher at the New York University Center for Disability, and the Department of Social and Cultural Analysis and Prison Education Program—will serve as Project Manager.

In addition, the project will support Social Change Fellows, who will lead aspects of the oral history work and create works using their own lived experience and material from the archive to speak to the long legacy of resistance against mass incarceration. The project’s first Social Change Fellow is Renaldo Hudson, an educator and community organizer whose work focuses on ending perpetual punishment in Illinois. Renaldo survived 37 years of incarceration, about half of which on death row, in the Illinois Department of Corrections. During that time, he founded groundbreaking programs including the prison-newspaper Stateville Speaks and the Building Block Program, a transformational program run by incarcerated people within the Illinois prison system.

As a Social Change Fellow, Renaldo leads a project focused on the movement to end the death penalty in Illinois as told by those directly impacted by it. That project is a collaboration between Renaldo, the Movements Lab, and the Chicago-based social-change multimedia collective Soapbox Productions and Organizing. “The oral histories of the movements that happened in prison are vitally important because these histories will not be heard if spaces are not created for them to be told,” said Renaldo. “So now that we are able to create these spaces, it’s our duty to enable the telling of these histories from the people who lived in those moments. Our documentary offers a raw and authentic look at the realities of death row from the voices of those who have been directly impacted by its existence, such that we are leading the conversation rather than being passive observers."

Incarcerated mothers visit with their families at a Christmas party at Rikers Island. Photo by Viviane Moos/CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images.

“Working with the Movement Lab, we hope to further demonstrate the power of community organizing amongst a broad and dynamic group of women through a Network Mapping Project,” said Michelle Daniel Jones, a justice impacted collaborator with Women Transcending, a project of The Center for Justice at Columbia University that focuses on the impact of the mass incarceration system on women and girls, emphasizing women's crucial roles in driving change within these systems. One of the Movements Lab’s partner organizations, Women Transcending is conducting an oral history of the creation of the College Program at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. Michelle along with a group of women in Women Transcending are dedicated to documenting, preserving, and raising up the history of leadership and community organizing efforts of incarcerated, formerly incarcerated, and directly impacted women in the context of mass incarceration.

This work reflects Incite’s investment in socially engaged oral history and public history work that uplifts all forms of expertise. The Movements Against Mass Incarceration Lab ensures not just the preservation of the past, but also the continued inspiration and activation of activists and communities of the present and future.

“This is a reflection of our ongoing commitment to socially engaged work that centers expertise where it resides,” said Michael Falco, Incite Executive Director and co-investigator on the project. “The Movements Lab isn’t just a repository that draws these experiences together, it is a project investing deeply in communities to help share their histories on their terms, to build ties across these movements, and to support the telling of these stories through exciting new modes.”


More news

 
The Obama Administration's Approach to Healthcare Reform, From the Outside In
 

The Obama Presidency Oral History releases 26 new interviews and 400 new stories related to healthcare reform on an innovative new website.

In her interview, Connie Anderson discusses the impact of her late sister Natoma Canfield's letter to President Obama. She details how the letter, which described Canfield's struggle with rising health insurance premiums after her cancer battle, influenced healthcare reform. Pictured above, President Obama speaks with Canfield, right, and Anderson, in the Oval Office, on December 12, 2012. Canfield's letter hangs on the wall in the background. Canfield died in June 2021. Photo by Pete Souza.

This week, coinciding with the 14th anniversary of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) being signed into law, Columbia University’s Incite Institute released 26 new interviews from the Obama Presidency Oral History.

The interviews, available on the project’s website, tell the story of the ACA, from inception to passage to implementation, through the voices of White House officials and advisors, congressional staff, industry and civil society leaders, union members, and extraordinary citizens.

This release is the project’s first since May 2023, when 17 interviews related to climate, the environment, and energy were released and a panel discussion was held in New York City. The Obama Presidency Oral History makes visible the dialogic relationships of power—between those who wield it, and those who influence and experience it—in shaping policy and American life.

“The ACA is an extraordinary achievement that changed the lives of tens of millions of Americans,” says the project’s Principal Investigator, Peter Bearman. He added, “How that happened is important to understand and this study tells that story.”

A Rubik’s Cube of Negotiations

In a press briefing on March 20, 2024, Associate Research Scholar Evan McCormick reinforced that the unique, expansive design of this project is critical to understanding healthcare reform. He cited an interview with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Nancy-Anne DeParle, in which DeParle recalls President Obama using a Rubik’s Cube as a metaphor

      “The president used to make this motion—I think I have one of these on my desk somewhere. Yes. Here it is. He used to make this motion [twists hands], and without having a real Rubik’s Cube, he’d say, 'It’s like we’ve just got to get each—you know, there’s so many moving parts. We’ve just got to get them to click into place.'

      And I remember thinking, yes, Mr. President, and you’re so smart, you probably could do [laughs] the Rubik’s Cube, but I can’t. And every time I move the orange, the blue—I think I’ve got the two orange ones lining up, and then the blue shoots in there, and I can’t fix it. But there were a lot of days like that, where you get two things to agree, and then the other one would be a problem.”

“Seeing the ACA from the inside-out and the outside-in makes it possible to understand the complex process by which the law came to be, and what it means to Americans more than a dozen years later,” McCormick said.

This latest release includes interviews with union leaders Andy Stern (SEIU) and Richard Trumka (AFL-CIO), former Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, National Medical Association President Carolyn Britton, and American Medical Association President Nancy Nielsen, all of whom had a role in shaping the ACA.

Moreover, the release highlights the  engaged citizens whose actions influenced the presidency, including Connie Anderson, who, with her sister, became a face of the ACA, Jim Houser, an Oregon auto shop owner turned healthcare advocate, and Michael Minor, a pastor who fought to expand healthcare access in Mississippi.

Breakthroughs in Digital Oral History Presentation

When the Obama Presidency Oral History began releasing interviews last year, its website was praised for pushing the envelope on accessibility and user-friendliness. With this latest release, Incite, an interdisciplinary social science research institute at Columbia, has unveiled several new innovations that represent breakthroughs in how oral histories are made available online.

A core innovation is the development of stories—moments in interviews that are identified from instances where narrators discuss a common topic, person, policy, place, or organization at length. Using a combination of close reading and statistical methods, Incite has identified thousands of stories and their overlaps, allowing users to easily explore and compare different perspectives. More than 1,700 of these stories are now available for the first time.

The updated Obama Presidency Oral History website’s mapping feature allows users to explore thousands of interview references to places in America and around the world.

A core innovation is the development of stories—moments in interviews that are identified from instances where narrators discuss a common topic, person, policy, place, or organization at length. Using a combination of close reading and statistical methods, Incite has identified thousands of stories and their overlaps, allowing users to easily explore and compare different perspectives. More than 1,700 of these stories are now available for the first time.

The updated Obama Presidency Oral History website allows users to explore more than 1,700 interconnected stories, a figure that will grow as interviews are released.

The stories are used as building blocks for several new features, including a timeline, map, and playlists. In addition, these stories are used to index oral history interviews, allowing users to more deeply engage with key interview moments.

“These innovations help make oral history interviews more navigable than ever and help visitors surface stories, make comparisons, and explore issues from a multitude of perspectives,” said Chris Pandza, who spearheaded the project’s public-facing design in collaboration with the award-winning creative agency Huncwot, natural language processing expert Jean-Philippe Cointet from Sciences Po, and Incite’s internal research team. The design aims to provide a user experience that is accessible to broad audiences and provides many entry points for people from all walks of life.

As the Obama Presidency Oral History archive grows, more features will come online.


More news

 
Logic(s) grows its team with over twenty-five new copy editors, fact-checkers, and fellows.
 

Logic(s) issue #20: Policy: Seductions & Silences

Since relaunching in 2022 as the first magazine to explore tech from Black, Asian, and queer vantage points, Logic(s) has seen steady growth.

Most immediately apparent, the publication has grown in size—from roughly eleven black-and-white articles per issue to an average of twenty-five full-color pieces, ranging from critical analysis to fashion to poetry. The magazine’s editorial ambit has also broadened, engaging emerging contributors in addition to established voices. Since its relaunch, Logic(s) has brought forward the work of more than fifty contributors, highlighting Black, queer, Dalit, incarcerated, trans, and Indigenous writing on technology from across the globe. Additionally, Logic(s) has grown through partnerships—including a collaboration with the American Civil Liberties Union to report on Allegheny County’s family policing systems, the revival of a storied New York City space for Pride Month, and joint stewardship of a home for interdisciplinary work at The Clemente Soto Vélez Cultural and Educational Center.

Supporting this growth is a dedicated team that has seen over 25 new additions in 2024. Michael Falco, executive director of Incite, illustrates the dimensions of this work: “Building this type of work requires the steadfast commitment of so many community partners, institutions, and, critically, our subscribers. Our goal is to continue growing and to keep finding ways to more fully support our contributors and their growth in their practice.” 

In an ongoing effort to be more expansive and inclusive, this year Logic(s) also launched a Developmental Editor Fellowship that brings on thirteen writers, creators, and technologists in various stages of their careers to develop and edit bold interdisciplinary pieces that fuse fiction, fashion, poetry, and performance arts with critical writing on technology. In addition, Logic(s) is thrilled to unveil an innovative Liberatory Tech Fellowship in collaboration with The Human in Computing and Cognition (THiCC) lab at Penn State University, welcoming a cohort of graduate-level computing and engineering students as THiCC Fellows. In this role, they will serve as technical consultants, deepening the magazine’s capacity to convey specialized knowledge to those most affected by these technical systems. We are also currently raising funds to support a fellowship for Palestinian journalists.

Logic(s) will release its next issue, on medicine and tech, in June 2024. To support this work and receive the magazine’s next issue, subscribe at logicmag.io.

 

Editorial Fellows

Angela Chen is a journalist, editor, and author. She has been on staff at WIRED, MIT Technology Review, Vox Media’s The Verge, and The Wall Street Journal. Her reporting and essays have appeared in The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Guardian, Paris Review, Chronicle of Higher Education, Lapham’s Quarterly, National Geographic, and more. She is also the author of Ace: What Asexuality Reveals about Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex, which was named one of the best books of 2020 by NPR.


O. F. Cieri is a novelist with a background in anthropology. She has studied at BMCC and Hunter College. Her prior publications can be found on her website, ofcieri.com.

Rezina Habtemariam is a writer and researcher interrogating the technologies that make Black life (im)possible. Habtemariam is currently a project manager with the African Poetry Book Fund, global Black poetics is critical to her work. Habtemariam writes and thinks from Mexico City.

Osahon Ize-Iyamu is a Nigerian writer whose fiction has appeared in avenues like Lightspeed, Nightmare, Clarkesworld, and Strange Horizons. He is a graduate of the Alpha Writers Workshop and the Clarion 2023 Workshop (where he was an Octavia Butler scholar), and is a recipient of a MacDowell Fellowship. You can find him online @osahon4545.

 

Ra'il I’Nasah Kiam is a writer, artist, digital curator, and independent scholar and researcher. Their work focuses on Black politics and cultural production, the American South, and online misinformation/disinformation.

 

Jasmine Lewis (she/her) is a multi-intentional artist, scholar, and vanguard of social change who approaches her aspirations in the same way that she perceives the world—kaleidoscopically. In addition to founding the global storytelling collective TALMBAT, since 2019 Jasmine has served various communities through her work in movement-building and advocacy to craft a more equitable and inclusive society. Her mission is to live life authentically and impactfully, beaming a light of possibility to illuminate ways for future generations to blaze their own paths toward liberation.

 

Puck Lo (she/they) writes and makes films inspired by utopian politics and dystopian science fiction. As research director for Community Justice Exchange, a prison abolitionist organization, they spend their days dreaming up schemes to end state violence. Puck lives in Lenapehoking / Brooklyn, NY. Her latest film project, Unfinished, is a collectively reenacted queer revisionist history of race treason, anti-colonial resistance, fugitivity, and land in the US desert West during the late 1800s and early 1900s.

 

Hannah Lucal is a researcher focused on technology and state surveillance whose work supports organizing efforts to end policing. She is a senior policy advisor with Just Futures Law.

 

Eliza McCullough is a researcher and writer interested in the intersection of technology, labor, and racial justice. She recently cofounded Digital Thread, a collective that explores the role of technology in political violence via short-form video. She has a BA from the University of California, Berkeley, and lives in Brooklyn, NY.

 

Tendai Mutambu is a writer, editor, and exhibition curator based in Barcelona who specializes in contemporary art and artists’ moving image. He has an interest in organizing cultural workers and was a founding member of Dignity and Money Now (DAMN), a New Zealand–based artists’ rights advocacy group.

 

Muhib Nabulsi is a Palestinian organizer, writer, editor, and filmmaker living between Naarm and Magan-djin in so-called Australia. They’re currently trying to reconceptualize what it means to write/edit/publish in times of ongoing Western state-sponsored genocide.

 

Ed Ongweso is a Brooklyn-based writer who focuses on technology, finance, and labor and is Logic(s)’ finance editor. He cohosts the This Machine Kills podcast on the political economy of technology.

 

Shivangi Mariam Raj is a writer, translator, and independent researcher based between Paris and Delhi. She works with The Funambulist, a platform that examines the politics of space and bodies.

 

Data Science Fellow

Ali Alkhatib’s work centers on how machine learning and other algorithmic systems project and inscribe certain politics and power dynamics. Before coming to Logic(s), Ali was interim director at the Center for Applied Data Ethics at the University of San Francisco. He studied anthropology and informatics at UC Irvine, and then computer science at Stanford.

Lead Fact-checker

Simi Kadirgamar is a fact-checker with seven years of experience under her belt, including work at the New York Times, The Intercept, and the Center for Investigative Reporting. Her eclectic research interests include the political economy of disinformation, political organizing within the world of martial arts, and the national security state in South Asia.


Lead Copy Editor

Sam Smith[1] , a New York City–based manuscript editor, brings to the Logic(s) team nearly a decade’s experience collaborating with scholars, journalists, and activists to bring forward a range of critical works, with a particular focus on technology and society, political theory, and cultural criticism. Their background in organizing and advocacy, including prison abolition and trans-border solidarity initiatives, informs their editorial approach.


Social Media

Bri Griffin is the social media manager for Logic(s). They’re interested in research related to internet culture and digital curation.


Design

raya marie hazell (she/they) is the daughter of multiple diasporas. As an independent artist and freelance designer, her work spans physical, digital, and social space. Through collage, installation, digital design, and ritual performance, raya hosts stories around climate grief, blackness and legibility, critical technological futures, and the political power of collective mourning.


Fact-Checkers

Mattene Toure, Elizabeth Adetiba, Kadal Jesuthasan, Rosemarie Ho, Amber Fatima Rahman, Sophie Hurwitz, Matt Dagher-Marghosian

 

Copy Editors

Jasmine Butler, Jean Yoon, Nia Abram, Anisha Dutta, Andrea Abi-Karam, Kayla Herrera Daya, Leena Aboutaleb, Dao Tran

Liberatory Tech Fellows

Ankolika De is a second-year PhD candidate in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State University, advised by Dr. Kelley Cotter. She is interested in designing technologies that can empower historically marginalized communities. More recently, she has been evaluating how fast-changing information infrastructures impact those who use such structures for empowerment. Her work has been accepted in top-tier venues such as CHI, ICA, and journals like New Media and Society. Ankolika was born and raised in Mumbai, India, and is proficient in the Indian classical dance form of Bharatanatyam. She is also a part of Natya—Penn State’s only competitive Indian classical dance team—and is an avid dancer. In her free time, she likes reading, cooking, and traveling. Before coming to Penn State, she completed her undergraduate degree in computer science with a minor in psychology from City University of Hong Kong, advised by Dr. Zhicong Lu. She graduated with first-class honors.

 

Swapnika Dulam is a second-year master’s student in computer science at Penn State University and a graduate research assistant in the THiCC Lab. She is from India and did her integrated dual degree (BTech + MTech) in computer science and engineering from JNTUHCEH, India. She has four years of industry experience as a full-stack developer and has designed distributed systems with Restful API using Java, Angular, ReactJS, etc. She aims to develop sociotechnical systems to ensure fair treatment of all people, irrespective of race, gender, or religion. She is interested in cognitive science and works with ACT-R cognitive architecture. She believes in sustainable living and has a green thumb. She has a lot of hobbies, including crocheting, baking, playing Kalimba, ceramic wheel-thrown pottery, and more. Her goal is to make the world a better place for future generations.

Sanjana Gautam is a PhD candidate at Penn State University, advised by Dr. Mary Beth Rosson. She has led research projects in the domains of educational technology, responsible AI, crisis response, and social media informatics. Her work focuses on designing AI-based socio-technical systems that are inspired by human behavioral theories. She is driven by the quest to create safe and inclusive spaces for all. Prior to starting her PhD at Penn State University, she completed her bachelor’s in computer science with a minor in economics at Shiv Nadar University, India. She has published at top-tier conferences such as CSCW, CHI, EMNLP, EACL, among others. Outside of work, she enjoys art (Madhubani), dancing (the Indian classical dance forms Bharatnatyam and Kathak), and traveling.

 

Tianqi Kou is a PhD student in information science at Penn State University working at the intersection of feminist science and technology studies and AI ethics. He is particularly interested in applying a feminist epistemological lens to the study of technology and epistemic values embedded in machine learning research practices and evaluation. Currently, Tianqi is researching the concept of replicability in ML research, focusing on how its conceptualization can be modified to improve scientific communication of ML research, which Tianqi has presented at philosophy of science and data science conferences as an invited speaker. Born and raised in China, Tianqi is also interested in bringing transnational perspectives into thinking about AI ethics, the means of resistance for AI industry labor, as well as LGBTQ+ rights. Prior to his doctoral training, Tianqi received a BS in economics at Harbin Institute of Technology and an MS in statistics and machine learning at Fordham University, and worked in the industry as a machine learning engineer. Outside of work, Tianqi enjoys climbing, filmmaking, and being a parent to his pets Gin, Tonic, and Dionysus.

Mukund Srinath is a PhD student in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State University. He is interested in creating scalable, fair, and trustworthy information retrieval and natural language processing systems. Mukund is currently working on improving the online user privacy landscape by helping users better understand what happens with their data online. Mukund was born and raised in Bengaluru, India. He did his bachelor’s in electrical and electronics engineering and worked as a software engineer for two years. Outside of work, Mukund enjoys reading, hiking, playing squash, and badminton.

 

Anya Martin is a PhD student in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State University. She is interested in the ways that machine learning methods change research practices and is currently studying the increasing use of machine learning in climate modeling. She previously completed her master’s in computer science with a specialization in machine learning methods at the University of California, Los Angeles.

 
Bundles Scholars Will Partner with Incite to Offer New Program Benefits–Application Period Is Now Open

The collaboration between Columbia University’s Bundles Scholars and Incite will create enhanced funding, mentorship, skill-building, and networking opportunities for program participants.

Apply to the Bundles Scholars Program

Attend the Bundles Scholar Lecture by Literary Agent Kevin O'Connor

The A'Lelia Bundles Community Scholars program at Columbia University today announced that it has partnered with Incite  to offer program participants several new opportunities and enhancements, including greater funding, mentorship, skill-building, and networking.

The Bundles Scholars program gives members of the Upper Manhattan community a three-year affiliation with Columbia and access to campus resources while they work on a project or skill that relates to or benefits their community. Last year, in an effort to  expand its offerings, Bundles Scholars embarked on a program-wide evaluation and surveyed its entire community of scholars, past and present, for suggestions on what would make the program stronger as it enters its 12th year.

Along with the connection to Incite and its resources, program enhancements identified by the scholars will help to expand community-based initiatives, support professional growth for members of the local community participating in the program, and uncover opportunities to support the growth of a scholar’s work after their time in the program.

Additional benefits for current and future scholars will include:

  • Access to enhanced financial and administrative support to grow projects, including potential fiscal sponsorship.

  • Funding opportunities for developing joint projects with other Bundles Scholars (past and present) as well as with other members of the Columbia community.

  • Co-creation and development of skill-building short courses and seminars.

  • Participation in the Incite community, which is composed of academics, artists, activists, and other area specialists.

  • Dedicated mentorship in the development of a project.

“The A’Lelia Bundles Community Scholars program invites our neighbors to strengthen our scholarly community with diverse perspectives and to share in our resources in ways that bring new voices to the fore. The new partnership with Incite will allow the program to grow and reflects the university’s commitment to bringing together the best minds, to dismantling barriers to success, and to supporting work that enhances life on campus, in our community, and across the globe,” said Interim Provost Dennis Mitchell.

“We are thrilled to be partnering with the Incite institute to bring Columbia’s A’lelia Bundles Community Scholars more resources, mentoring, and opportunities to grow their projects. More than a decade since the program was founded as a way to give community members in Upper Manhattan access to the resources of Columbia University, this collaboration will further empower scholars to make meaningful contributions to their communities and beyond,” said Deb Sack, vice president of operations in the Office of Public Affairs, who leads the office’s work with the scholars through its Government and Community Affairs unit.

“The School of Professional Studies (SPS) has been a proud partner of the A'Lelia Bundles Community Scholars program since its inception in 2013," said Troy Eggers, dean of the Columbia University School of Professional Studies. “We are excited to see what innovations and support that Incite will bring to this important community initiative.”

"Incite is driven by the belief that work confined within the walls of Columbia risks being detached from the lives of the worlds we can transform. Outside our walls, organizers, artists, community leaders, and workers engage issues to transform their worlds, their communities, and their lives. Linking with the Bundles Scholars, and its decade of supporting and welcoming our neighbors, is an exciting way for Incite to continue to engage with alternate sites of knowledge and to help accelerate the work of our local community with the profound administrative and intellectual resources Columbia offers," said Michael Falco, Incite executive director.

Incite, an interdisciplinary institute at Columbia, produces knowledge for public action by joining with people and organizations within and outside the university to rethink our understanding of what knowledge is, how it’s created, and how it can be used. Incite will enhance the ways in which scholars join the Columbia community and connect with the university's intellectual life. The Bundles Scholars program is a joint initiative of Columbia University’s Office of Government and Community Affairs (GCA), Office of the Provost, and School of Professional Studies.

The application period for the next cohort of Bundles Scholars is now open. The deadline to apply is May 13, 2024.

Michael Falco
Tackling Colombian inequality with art, dialogue, and a community think tank
 

Launching this year, Incite’s Global Change Program (GCP) will further internationalize and develop our mission by partnering with project leaders around the world who are tackling issues ranging from poverty to climate change to unequal access to health care.

 

Dr. Allison Benson-Hernández

 

To pilot the program in 2023–2024, Incite awarded its first GCP grant to Dr. Allison Benson-Hernández, a former Obama Foundation Scholar whose organization Re-imagenemos (Reimagining) is fostering the first national-level conversation about inequality in Colombia. Incite’s funding will support the project’s program of eight regional dialogues on inequality, followed by local dialogues in each of Colombia’s 32 departments. Through these dialogues, more than 150 people from different social backgrounds and professional perspectives will work together to build an agenda of community-led initiatives on inequality. With Incite’s support, Re-imagenemos aims to organize seven Cross-Regional Dialogues On Inequality reaching in excess of 20,000 people.


Dr. Benson-Hernández discussing Re-imagenemos.
Enable captions for English translation.


A conversation with Dr. Benson-Hernández

Chris Pandza sat down with Dr. Benson-Hernández to learn more about inequality in Colombia, Re-imagenemos, and Benson-Hernández’s ambitious plan for the next year.

Pandza:

Inequality is the primary lens through which your work is focused, but inequality can mean different things in different contexts. What does inequality look like in Colombia?

Benson-Hernández:

Inequality in Colombia looks like two worlds that don't think about each other—that don't ever meet.

For example, there’s spatial segregation. Our cities are distinctly split between rich and poor parts, and most people don't go from one area to one another. Another visual dimension of inequality has to do with skin color. If you look indigenous, or if you are black, you're probably in a more vulnerable situation from a socioeconomic perspective. So inequality also has a color.

Another very key way in which inequality can be seen is across the regions of Colombia—the urban-rural divide. It's very big. A city like Bogotá can be similar in many ways to New York in terms of access to service, infrastructure, and transport. But if you go to a rural area, even if it's 40 minutes away from Bogotá, you will arrive in places where there are only dirt roads where you have to walk for two hours to go to a bank. Where water and energy are not constant throughout the day. We say that we have a lot of countries within the country.

So these call like territorial dimension of inequality is very geographical dimension of inequality is very important. And that at the core of this project that Incite is supporting, which is the territorial dialogues.

Participants at a 2023 Cross-Regional Dialogue On Inequality.

Pandza:

How did inequality become your focus?

Benson-Hernández:

During our presidential elections, I wondered why all the candidates were speaking about a lot of problems that we have, but not the one that I thought was the root cause: inequality. They were openly speaking about corruption, and violence, lack of social expenditure, and education quality, but none of them openly spoke about inequality as a problem.

I think that has to do with the fact that speaking about inequality is more difficult than speaking about poverty in academia, politics, or regular conversations, because inequality implies that there are some people in an unfair position or with unfair privileges. That's difficult to realize, and difficult to make a collective purpose.

And in political terms, we have this very complex reference of Cuba—and especially Venezuela, which did have a redistributive narrative. But because the results have been so difficult for these countries and people have actually become poorer, it's easy to sideline this discourse as utopian, that it's going to lead us to communism.

To create social change, we have to first recognize the issues. We have to be able to say that things are bad. So the purpose was—how can we start talking about inequality as a depoliticized word, but a word that brings people together instead of scaring people or discarding narratives? Once we realize this, how do we create change in our daily lives?

Pandza:

How did that realization lead to founding Re-imagenemos?

Benson-Hernández:

After the elections I wanted to write some pieces about inequality in a national newspaper. But I realized I'm not an expert in every topic, so I invited people to cooperate with me.

I invited a friend who is a PhD in public health and another academic working with land issues. But I realized that our perspectives would be more impactful if we didn't speak from a theoretical, privileged position in which we analyze social reality as a thing that you study. I wanted to think about how we could talk about this as something that we live, not only study.

That’s why I thought of inviting other voices. I originally wanted to speak about 12–15 types of inequality, but when I invited people, they brought in more and more topics—and the list kept increasing. We ended up with these 30 topics of inequality. Others suggested that we should also invite artists. It was like a collective ideation process and then we realized we were 150 people organizing 30 different topics for almost three years.

All the work that we did through these three years was completely informal. We were like a collective, but not really an organization. The full formal organization process came during the Obama Foundation fellowship in which I registered and did everything to formalize what we were doing organically. We're describing ourselves as a community think tank. We want to be recognized as a key—and maybe the only—community think tank in the country.

Pandza:

Your work is actualized through dialogue across sectors and regions. Why dialogue? And in practice, how does Re-imagenemos mobilize dialogue?

Benson-Hernández:

Social dialogue is very worthy in itself, especially in a context like Colombia, in which social dialogue has been silenced by the armed conflict for many years. So this was a country, or is in a way, a country in which if you speak, you can be stigmatized as being a guerrilla activist or a paramilitary activist. Or you can be killed.

Finding a space of rebirth of dialogue is very worthy in itself, but it is not enough. So what material products can we build? From the process of dialogue, we are thinking about four concrete products.

One is what we call the incidents, the social incidents or the advocacy products, which are these columns and social art pieces that we're going to publish on social media.

The second product is a report with policy recommendations. We're going to spend a year talking to hundreds of people throughout the country. And in this exercise, we're going to identify solutions that are happening around the country. We're going to organize all of these in a policy report and then give this report to the Ministry of Equality which was created a couple of months ago. We wanted to give it to governors and mayors and say this is an input we hope you use.

The third product that we want to create is the collaborative research agenda. We are going to pair academics from the big universities that have all their resources and visibility—and that are almost all located in Bogotá—with academics from very small, regional universities so they can come up with research questions and build a research agenda. That starts with the dialogues, but then can last for years of research, analysis, and conversations.

The fourth product is micro grant support for communities to actually replicate and appropriate our project. For example, how if you're a teacher in a school, or you can organize these types of dialogues with students or with students and teachers. Or if you're a social leader, and you want to organize it with your members and the government, or the enterprise that generates jobs in the region.

Pandza:

How do you anticipate GCP will impact your work? I know you’re planning several in-person Cross-Regional Dialogues On Inequality that will also be broadcast online.

Benson-Hernández:

Without these resources, we would not be doing Cross-Regional Dialogues On Inequality. GCP will allow us to organize seven events reaching an additional 20,000 people through our online and social media outputs.

We’ll also be able to build or identify a network of people who are working to build equality all throughout the country. In the exercise of inviting people to the conversation and to the events, we're doing a very big work of actor mapping. That's a very concrete output that we expect. And again, this comes to the, goes back to the idea of these dialogues being just like the first seed of something that we want.

We want these discussions to translate into action. Not only improbable dialogues, but also improbable action across sectors.

Pandza:

You mentioned that you include artists in these discussions. Why?

Benson-Hernández:

One of Re-imagenemos’ essential differentials is bringing the arts into the conversation.

When I invite artists to the conversations, and I say we're going to talk about race inequality, they sometimes say, “Oh, I'm not an expert on race inequality. I don't know about those things.” And I always answer that I want them to speak from two perspectives.

First, as people who actually experience these things. Not as a technical concept, but as a lived experience. You are not an expert, but you have eyes, you have feelings, you live in this country, so you do have things to say. That's bringing artists into the social conversation. That's part one.

Second, artists can translate the dialogue that is happening between different forms of language into communication channels that can actually connect more with people, because they appeal to emotion. To aesthetics. To things that actually connect with our capacity of reimagining other realities. They have a potential that words cannot ever reach. So that's what the invitation is. To use their abilities to translate conversations into more relatable languages that people can actually process more.

Pandza:

At Incite, when we think about how we engage with people outside of the university, we talk a lot about extractive work or extractive practices. How does this factor into your work?

Benson-Hernández:

Yeah, that's a great question.

First, we should not call what we do outreach activities—outreach is about asking the questions, coming up with the answers, and then telling others about it. It's a very top-down approach about taking academia outside, and from a hierarchical position.

What we're trying to do is not outreach, but inreach—what we'd call building bridges of communication, of empathy, and of relations of ideation. So for us, the process of communicating with other actors from other sectors starts from a human connection and then we go into connecting ideas and narratives.

But the first step is to say okay, we're two people, and we're talking about an issue. And this implies being cognizant and aware of biases that we have.

We had a conversation on Friday wherein we had people who were social leaders who never went to school. And then we had a PhD researcher who is very well known, not only in Colombia, but internationally as a researcher. I opened the panel with the activists and then the last one to speak was the researcher, because if he would have started, that may have introduced a power relation, an expectation that everyone would speak with the same kind of language as the researcher. We talk a lot about a dialogue between forms of knowledge—acknowledging that there are a lot of forms of knowledge, not only the formal scientific knowledge that we should all value. That they all have contributions to the process of collective knowledge generation.

Participants at a 2023 Cross-Regional Dialogue On Inequality.

Pandza:

Do any other images from that event stick out in your mind?

Benson-Hernández:

There was this point in which one of the speakers told the audience to take a minute to look at this stage because what you're looking at in this moment is special. We are seven people from seven very different backgrounds. With seven very different colors of skin, but we are all sitting here listening to each other and achieving a dialogue from diversity.

It’s something that doesn't happen every day. So I think when he actually called people to notice this, which is the essence of what we've been trying to do in these three years, I thought, okay, we’re doing it.


The Global Change Program will be seeking new grantees later in 2024. Be the first to know when our applications open by subscribing to our mailing list.

 
Incite launches grant program for change agents around the world
 

Launching this year, Incite’s Global Change Program will endow change agents around the world with financial and intellectual support. Plus, find out how our first GCP grant recipient is tackling inequality in Colombia with art, dialogue, and the country’s first-ever community think tank.

Participants at a Re-imagenemos event in 2023.

While academic institutions are working to understand the most complex and pressing issues of our time–from climate change, to inequality, to public health, to failing trust in institutions—communities around the world are tackling these very problems with locally cultivated expertise and ingenuity. Though many academic institutions are realizing the value of community partnership, the relationships that underpin these partnerships risk reproducing hierarchy and extraction, rather than fostering collaborations that value multiple forms of expertise, enhancing capacities for both knowledge production and change.

At Incite, we’re experimenting with project models that break down barriers between the academy and worlds where change is made. To do so, we endow change agents with resources and intellectual support, whether through developing innovative public initiatives across the country with Assembling Voices, putting incarcerated writers’ perspectives in the same publications as academics in Logic(s) magazine, or empowering high schoolers to inform their local electorates with MyVote Project.

Launching this year, Incite’s Global Change Program (GCP) will further internationalize and develop our mission by partnering with project leaders around the world who are tackling issues ranging from poverty to climate change to unequal access to health care.

Each year, GCP will award $50,000 in grants to individuals leading campaigns that assemble their communities in service of furthering democracy, equity, and justice. Awardees will receive intellectual support from Incite, including assistance with project design and facilitated collaboration with a center or institute of their preference at Columbia. Through that collaboration, Incite hopes to generate scholarship and foster conversations about global challenges that remain rooted in the work of communities most directly grappling with their effects.

Evan McCormick, a historian and Associate Research Scholar at Incite is developing and leading this program:

This project is about bridging the gap between universities and communities that share in the task of answering urgent questions about the future of our world. By meeting project leaders where they are, with the support and resources they need to advance community-based work, we can actively bring local experience and perspectives into scholarly conversations happening at universities like Columbia.

If you or somebody in your network is interested in learning more about applying to the Global Change Program, reach out to Evan McCormick. Be the first to know when our applications open by subscribing to our mailing list.


Dr. Allison Benson-Hernández

To pilot the program in 2023–2024, Incite awarded its first GCP grant to Dr. Allison Benson-Hernández, a former Obama Foundation Scholar whose organization Re-imagenemos (Reimagining) is fostering the first national-level conversation about inequality in Colombia. Incite’s funding will support the project’s program of eight regional dialogues on inequality, followed by local dialogues in each of Colombia’s 32 departments. Through these dialogues, more than 150 people from different social backgrounds and professional perspectives will work together to build an agenda of community-led initiatives on inequality. With Incite’s support, Re-imagenemos aims to organize seven Cross-Regional Dialogues On Inequality reaching in excess of 20,000 people.

Chris Pandza sat down with Dr. Benson-Hernández to learn more about inequality in Colombia, Re-imagenemos, and Benson-Hernández’s ambitious plan for the next year.

Find out more >

 
Remembering Ronald J. Grele
 

For details on Ron Grele’s memorial on Jan 13, 2024, click here.

Mary Marshall Clark, Director of the Columbia Center for Oral History Research

Ronald J. Grele, former director of the Columbia University Oral History Center for Research, former associate professor in the Columbia History Department and past president of the national Oral History Association died peacefully surrounded by family and friends in his New York City home on December 13, 2023.  Beloved by friends, family, students, and colleagues scattered far and wide, Ron shaped the oral history movement in the United States and around the world with his intellectual rigor, passion, and generosity.  Ron served as director of the Columbia Center for Oral History Research (then called the Oral History Research Office) from 1982-2000. As director, he used his expansive interdisciplinary knowledge and networks around the world to build a field made up of curious fieldworkers, brilliant academics and researchers, activists, and community-based workers from Harlem to Chinatown who helped define and expand the field of oral history for generations. 

As editor-in-chief of The International Journal of Oral History in the crucial years from 1981-1985, Ron engaged hundreds of oral historians in international conferences to write up their fieldwork and encouraged them to try their hands at developing oral history theory in interdisciplinary ways.  Current students still use the IJOH to inspire their own fieldwork and to devise interpretative frames. Ron was president of the OHA from 1987-1988 and took a leadership role in defining ethical standards for the practice of oral history nationally.  He traveled the world to present at oral history conferences and participated in the founding of the International Oral History Association.   In 1994, Columbia held a defining international conference that, for the first time moved international conferences beyond Europe and was inclusive of African, South American, and Latin American participation.

Ron also helped establish the Columbia University Summer Institute in Oral History, a two-week intensive training institute that has drawn thousands of students and scholars interested in oral history for over 27 years.  Through the Columbia History Department, Ron taught the graduate course Oral History Method and Theory to overenrolled classes. When at last the classes became too full, Mary Marshall Clark and Peter Bearman convinced the University to hold a full master’s degree program in Oral History [OHMA] that began in 2008.  Ron taught in OHMA along with close colleagues and leaders in oral history from the 1970s, Alessandro Portelli and Luisa Passerini. The interdisciplinary scholar Ann Cvetkovich, a former Rockefeller fellow with the Center in a Humanities program Ron co-founded in the late 1990s, currently teaches a course in OHMA with Mary Marshall Clark.  Most importantly Ron’s book, Envelopes of Sound, inspired students that they could learn to interpret fieldwork for themselves in their own cultural contexts which at the time was a radical thought and a thoughtful prediction of how oral history would grow.  Ron is a legend even to the students he did not directly teach. One student, learning of his death, wrote:

I can't believe that Ronald left! I am so sad to hear this! I am so lucky that I got chances to meet him at our workshops and see him asking questions seriously with bright eyes. Even though I have never talked to him one on one, I still feel connected with him in some way. His death is like a grandpa's death to me. A grandpa from the family of oral history. I will mourn him in my way and share this sad news with some Chinese colleagues who are influenced by Ronald's works. I am sad. From: Xiaoyan Li, graduate of the Oral History master’s program, 2018.  

Ronald Grele, right center; OHMA student Xiaoyan Li, far right.

Prior to coming to Columbia Ron directed the Oral History Program at UCLA and served as Research Director at the New Jersey Historical Commission and Assistant Director of the Ford Foundation Oral History Project. He began his career in oral history as an interviewer and archivist at the John F. Kennedy Oral History Program, housed at the John F. Kennedy Library. He was awarded a Fulbright teaching appointment at the University of Indonesia and has conducted workshops and seminars on oral history throughout Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Fascinated by the potential of oral history to intervene in production of historical memory, Ron worked with his former student Peter Maguire, author of Facing Death in Cambodia, to train oral historians working at the Documentation Center of Cambodia (DC-CAM) taking oral histories of Khmer Rouge atrocities that were not publicly acknowledged for decades.

In addition to being the author of Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History (Prager, 1991, second edition), Ron was also editor of International Annual of Oral History: 1990: Subjectivity and Multiculturalism in Oral History (Greenwood, 1992).  Ron worked with a group of oral historians in Europe and the United States to document the 1968 revolution. These interviews were the basis of the book A Student Generation in Revolt: An International Oral History (Pantheon Books, 1988). He received his doctorate from Rutgers University and taught at Lafayette College, The California State University at Long Beach, and Kingsborough Community College. Ron served as a consultant on number of oral history projects and museums and historical agencies. He completed projects on the history of the Garrett Corporation in Los Angeles, McKinsey & Company, and the Boston Consulting Group. He has conducted biographical interviews for the Columbia Center for Oral History Research with women graduates of the Columbia Law School including Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, along with hundreds of life histories over the years.  He also conducted numerous interviews in his retirement for the Columbia Center’s Rule of Law Project, the Carnegie Corporation Project, and the history of the Atlantic Philanthropies. Ron volunteered to conduct interviews for a community history project documenting the social and cultural history of Harlem. Ron had an abiding devotion to community history projects, and devoted years of volunteer service to the Museum of the Chinese in the Americas. He will be remembered as an oral history enthusiast who inspired thousands of conversations and publications about oral history as an art as well as a discipline, and permanently established oral history education at Columbia University.

 
Michael Falcooral history
How do you teach listening?
 

The inaugural Pedagogy of Listening Lab cohort.

When thinking about the role of listening in education, we typically conceptualize teachers as speakers and students as listeners. However, scholars in several disciplines have demonstrated that listening can have a much more complicated (and beneficial) role in pedagogy.

Columbia University is home to a number of fields that have cultivated unique approaches to listening-focused pedagogy, such as oral history, narrative medicine, and social work. These centers, despite their proximity, have not been brought together for an interdisciplinary exploration of listening-based pedagogies—until now.

Directed by Liza Zapol, The Pedagogy of Listening: An Interdisciplinary Teaching Lab will bring together faculty, researchers, and students from different disciplines at Columbia University to advance understandings of pedagogies of listening.

In practice, this will include monthly meetings between faculty, fostering oral history exchanges with students and alumni, observing peer teaching, engaging in interdisciplinary discussions, and developing a pedagogical toolkit.

At the core of this lab is an understanding that teaching is an experiment in equality—not in the sense that teachers must forfeit their knowledge or authority, but that teachers can approach teaching from a place of mutuality and transparency. With this understanding, the lab will explore practices of listening that value the knowledge and experience of the learner and contribute to more inclusive teaching practices.

This lab was proposed by Liza Zapol (OHMA), Amy Starecheski (OHMA), Sayantani DasGupta (Narrative Medicine) and Ovita Williams (Social Work) and is supported by a 2023 Office of the Provost’s Teaching and Learning Grant.

"We teach students how to listen, and we model holistic listening in our classes," says Zapol. "This lab is an opportunity for us to interrogate how we teach these skills." In doing so, the lab hopes to transcend traditional modes of instruction by weaving listening into the fabric of teaching—recognizing that listening extends beyond aural and verbal modes of expression. Zapol says the team has begun this work by, "experimenting with how to create a space for listening, where we can exchange stories as educators and as people, and share how we are navigating these challenging times."

Ultimately, the program's goals are outward. "Through listening closely to each other's knowledge and experience, we're crafting new ways to bring these tools to others within the academic sphere," says Zapol. Coming out of the relationships and learnings from this year, the lab hopes to grow course cross-listings at Columbia and host ongoing programming for faculty across disciplines and schools.

To learn more about The Pedagogy of Listening and its inaugural cohort, visit the project’s page.